Monthly Mystery #20: Mudball on a String

Two weeks ago, as I began exploring the first of seven properties where I am conducting natural resource inventories this year for the Maine Coast Heritage Trust, I noticed a little ball of mud hanging from a goldenrod leaf. I was intrigued, but resisted the temptation to investigate it: I had lots of ground to cover, and I didn’t want to get distracted by minutia before I had accomplished anything. After I encountered a third one, however, I gave in and took some photos, then collected it.


The only one of these I remember seeing before was the one pictured on page 45 of Tracks & Sign of Insects…, which Noah photographed as we were wandering along a river in Pennsylvania. The paragraph accompanying that photo discusses how McCook (1884)* referred to the spider that makes this egg sac as Micaria limnicunae, and how it is unclear to what species that name refers. Platnick and Shadab (1988)**, in revising the genus Micaria (Gnaphosidae), listed this as an uncertain name:

The name M. limnicunae was applied only to egg sacs and spiderlings from Illinois, and no specimens identified by McCook can now be located in the collections of the Philadelphia Academy of Natural Sciences (Dr. James Newlin, in litt.); as Banks (1893) indicated, McCook’s description is “worthless.”

The spider may not even be a Micaria; McCook himself thought it might actually belong to the genus Herpyllus, which includes the eastern parson spider (H. ecclesiasticus):


Unfortunately, as far as I can tell, every known gnaphosid (ground spider) egg sac is an unadorned, disk-shaped object. Possibly some spiderlings will emerge from the egg sac I collected and shed some light on this mystery, but so far I have never succeeded in raising any kind of spider from egg to adult.

Here’s another observation that may or may not be relevant: Two years ago I collected this sand-covered egg sac, which was one of many found under some snake boards (big pieces of plywood lying on the ground) on Nantucket:


Some spiderlings emerged, but none lived to be more than about 1.5 mm long.


I would have had no clue what to call them, but Mandy Howe recognized them as liocranid sac spiders, probably in the genus Agroeca. Fortunately, Andrew McKenna-Foster has done extensive spider surveys on the island, and he told me that Agroeca is the only liocranid he has caught there. He has identified two species, A. pratensis and A. ornata; the former seems to be more common there.

It is well known that some European Agroeca species construct pendulous, dirt- or mud-covered egg sacs, but I haven’t found any references to American species doing this. Is McCook’s description of Micaria limnicunae so “worthless” that it might actually refer to an Agroeca? I haven’t checked, and I don’t know enough about spider identification to be able to judge, but I would be interested to hear an arachnologist’s take on this.

* McCook, H. C.  1884. A spider that makes a spherical mud-daub cocoon. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 36:151-153.

** Platnick, N. I. and M. U. Shadab. 1988. A revision of the American spiders of the genus Micaria (Araneae, Gnaphosidae). American Museum Novitates 2916:1-64.




About Charley Eiseman

I am a freelance naturalist, endlessly fascinated by the interconnections of all the living and nonliving things around me. I am the lead author of Tracks & Sign of Insects and Other Invertebrates (Stackpole Books, 2010), and continue to collect photographs and information on this subject. These days I am especially drawn to galls, leaf mines, and other plant-insect interactions.
This entry was posted in Unsolved Mysteries and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Monthly Mystery #20: Mudball on a String

  1. Ilona L. says: — I posted a photo on Bugguide of a sac that looks similar to the first one shown above. The sac was attached to a Narcissus leaf and I noticed the sac as I was cutting down the leaves. I kept the sac in a container long enough for the small spiderlings to emerge but they are probably identifiable at such a small stage. It may have nothing to do with this but I also came across the first Eastern Parson spider (H. ecclesiasticus) I’ve seen on June 5th located around 30 feet away from where the sac was found.

    • That certainly seems to be the same egg sac. Did you get any shots that show the eye arrangement better? We’ll definitely need adults to be sure of the species, but the eye arrangement could help confirm the family.

  2. troymullens says:

    Always something new to see or learn. Nice

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s